Wednesday, February 27, 2019

What to Look for When AMC Entertainment Reports Earnings

AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) is the largest movie theater operator in the world, with exposure across the U.S. and Europe. Yet despite an all-time record box office in 2018, AMC's stock has not responded in kind. It now resides around $14, 35% below the recent high of $21.45 seen in September.

So what's the market's big concern? There are really several, hitting AMC all at once. Here's what investors should look for when the company reports fourth-quarter earnings on Thursday, Feb. 28.

AMC A-List: Dangerous success

The first concern surrounds AMC A-List, the company's subscription-based program in the vein of MoviePass. Unlike MoviePass, which is having severe financial problems, AMC's offering is priced at a more sustainable $19.95 per month. But in 2019, the company is raising the price of A-List to $23.95 in California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York, and to $21.95 in Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington state, and the District of Columbia. Early adopters who enrolled before 2019 at $19.95 can freeze that rate for 12 months.

Two hands reach into a large bag of popcorn in a movie theater.

Image source: Getty Images.

Despite far exceeding its subscriber targets in the first six months operating the service, A-List is actually one of the big concerns for investors. That's because it is causing AMC's margins to decrease, due to up-front marketing and high customer use in the initial rollout.

But management believes this is a short-term issue, and that the program will become profitable if the average A-Listers moderate their use to 2.5 visits per month. As of the company's last earnings call, management said average monthly use had declined from 3.4 visits to 2.7 visits within a subscriber's first three months. Therefore any commentary around the current A-List use rate would be a key to watch.

A-List subscribers exceeded 600,000 at the end of 2018, so an update on both the current subscriber count and the trajectory after the price increase will also be keys.

Box office roared in 2018 but has flopped so far in 2019

Another likely reason for the company's recent swoon is the dismal 2019 box office. Coming off a record U.S. and Canada box office in 2018, things have reversed since Jan. 1. Through Feb. 22, the box office is down a stunning 30% from this time last year. This has been due to the worst January since 2011, followed by the worst Presidents' Day weekend in 15 years.

Investors should keep their ears open for explanations from management. Likely, it will point to a lack of a Star Wars December release, which occurred each of the past few years. In addition, much of the country had historically low temperatures for a portion of January, which could also garner some of the blame.

With more and more studios about to release their own streaming services, every slow box office month brings concerns that the end of moviegoing is nigh. Management will likely try to refute this, as 2017 also had several dismal months, only to bounce back in 2018. Likely, AMC will instill hope around Captain Marvel coming in March, along with Frozen 2 and Star Wars Episode IX slated for the fourth quarter.

Recliners or debt paydown?

Finally, investors should look for an update on the company's capital allocation priorities. Over the past few years, AMC has invested heavily installing luxury recliner seating across much of its theater footprint. That has required heavy capital expenditures, even though the company's debt levels are quite high.

Management had maintained that the returns on investment from recliner seating far exceed its debt interest rate. But with interest rates on the rise, and with the company coming to the end of its recliner investment cycle, AMC may choose to dial back on recliner investment in favor of paying down debt, if not this year, then perhaps next. The company's first large debt maturity occurs in 2022, so paying down debt isn't urgent, but with over $5.3 billion in total debt obligations -- over $1.2 billion of which comes due in 2022 -- management should probably unveil its thinking on the capital structure for 2019 and 2020.

Multiple concerns, but a cheap stock

AMC's debt load and industry headwinds have brought the company's ratio of enterprise value to EBITDA down to just 7.25, well below rival Cinemark at 8.3 times. The keys for AMC's turnaround will be the success of A-List, a better box office, and clarity on its plan to pay down debt (or not). These are what investors should look for on Thursday.

Friday, February 22, 2019

Top Safest Stocks To Own Right Now

tags:SVVC,DDAIF,BF.B,NUAN, Despite several years of steady declines, deadly vehicle crashes are on the rise, according to the most recent data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The safest day to be on the road: Tuesday. The most dangerous? Saturday.

That's according to a new study by Avvo, an online legal referral and review site, which analyzed data from NHTSA's Fatality Analysis Reporting System in 2016 on how many car crash-related fatalities happened across the country by weekday and time of day. 

The analysis found that 6,802 lives were lost on Saturday out of the 37,461 road deaths that occurred in 2016. That was 53% higher than the 4,444 deaths that happened on a Tuesday, the day with the least number of crash-related fatalities. 

The second and third deadliest days were also associated with the weekend: Friday (5,826) and Sunday (5,809). 

Top Safest Stocks To Own Right Now: Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc.(SVVC)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Intl Fcstone Inc. increased its position in shares of Firsthand Technology Value Fund Inc (NASDAQ:SVVC) by 35.8% during the third quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 30,087 shares of the investment management company’s stock after acquiring an additional 7,924 shares during the period. Intl Fcstone Inc.’s holdings in Firsthand Technology Value Fund were worth $510,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Top Safest Stocks To Own Right Now: Daimler AG (DDAIF)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By ]

    I expect that other competitors, such as Uber, Lyft, GM (GM), Ford (F), Mercedes (OTCPK:DDAIF), and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) (so far undeclared) will also go aggressively after the ARS market. Some traditional car manufactures, like Jaguar and Chrysler, may provide "dumb cars" to technology companies that will retrofit them into autonomous vehicles. This may not be the case for all, however. Ford, GM, and Mercedes have stated their strategies to develop a complete autonomous ride service platform using their own autonomous capabilities.

  • [By John Rosevear]

    German auto and truck giant Daimler AG (NASDAQOTH:DDAIF) said that two big-truck operators, Penske Truck Leasing and NFI Industries, have agreed to begin using two all-new electric Freightliner trucks in a pilot program -- starting later this year. This is significant.

  • [By John Rosevear]

    By way of background, right now, Aston Martin's principal owners are an Italian private-equity fund, Investindustrial; a consortium led by Kuwaiti private-equity firm The Investment Dar (TID); and German automaker Daimler AG (NASDAQOTH:DDAIF), which owns a stake of about 4.9%. Several other private-equity firms hold smaller stakes. 

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Daimler (DDAIF)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By SEEKINGALPHA.COM]

    The recent news that Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (OTCPK:GELYF) has taken an approximate 10% share in Daimler AG (OTCPK:DDAIF) has shaken up the market. Geely already owns Volvo (OTCPK:VOLVY) cars and is a growing company investors might like to study carefully. Daimler already has a partnership with major auto manufacturer BAIC Motor Corp. (OTC:BCCMY) and with BYD. The joint venture with BYD has achieved little and this tie-up with Geely is seen as a source of some concern for BYD.

  • [By John Rosevear]

    The new electric trucks, a tractor-trailer and a smaller truck for deliveries, will take advantage of the battery-electric technology being developed by Freightliner's corporate parent, Daimler AG (NASDAQOTH:DDAIF), as it prepares to do battle with Silicon Valley upstart Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA).

Top Safest Stocks To Own Right Now: Brown Forman Corporation(BF.B)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Brown-Forman (BF.B)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Brown-Forman Co. Class B (NYSE:BF.B) issued an update on its FY19 earnings guidance on Wednesday morning. The company provided EPS guidance of $1.75-1.85 for the period, compared to the Thomson Reuters consensus EPS estimate of $1.83. The company issued revenue guidance of $3.44-3.48 billion (+6-7%), compared to the consensus revenue estimate of $3.46 billion.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Brown-Forman Co. (NYSE:BF.B) has been given a consensus rating of “Hold” by the twelve analysts that are presently covering the company, MarketBeat Ratings reports. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell recommendation, eight have assigned a hold recommendation and three have assigned a buy recommendation to the company. The average 12 month price objective among analysts that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $56.27.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Brown-Forman Co. Class B (BF.B)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Top Safest Stocks To Own Right Now: Nuance Communications Inc.(NUAN)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Shares of Nuance Communications Inc. (NASDAQ:NUAN) have been assigned a consensus recommendation of “Buy” from the twelve brokerages that are currently covering the firm, Marketbeat reports. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell recommendation, four have assigned a hold recommendation, five have given a buy recommendation and one has given a strong buy recommendation to the company. The average 1-year price objective among brokers that have covered the stock in the last year is $20.25.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Nuance Communications (NASDAQ:NUAN) had its price objective cut by Stifel Nicolaus from $18.00 to $15.00 in a report issued on Thursday. The brokerage currently has a “hold” rating on the software maker’s stock. Stifel Nicolaus’ target price indicates a potential upside of 15.03% from the company’s current price.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Nuance Communications Inc. (NASDAQ:NUAN) EVP Thomas L. Beaudoin sold 8,301 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Friday, February 1st. The shares were sold at an average price of $15.76, for a total transaction of $130,823.76. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through the SEC website.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcribing]

    Nuance Communications (NASDAQ:NUAN) Q1 2019 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 7, 2019 5:00 p.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Will This Regulation Derail Amazon in India?

Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) stock took a haircut after the company's fourth-quarter results were released. Wall Street was disappointed with the e-commerce giant's guidance as it calls for first-quarter sales growth of 14% at the midpoint, while analysts were looking for a 19% jump. But that was not the only bad news for shareholders on earnings day.

This is definitely not what Amazon wanted

Amazon has been hit hard by a change in e-commerce regulations in India that came into effect Feb. 1. According to a note issued by India's Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, e-commerce players with foreign investments cannot hold stakes in wholesale companies that sell on their marketplaces. Additionally, retail companies cannot get more than 25% of sales from just one platform.  

Unnamed sources told the Economic Times that sales via Amazon and Flipkart dropped by a third following the policy changes.

Amazon has been forced to pull product listings from its Indian site as it relied on two sellers -- Cloudtail and Appario Retail -- for the majority of its sales. Amazon holds a 49% stake in both of these entities, which means that it cannot sell inventory owned by them anymore. As Cloudtail was reportedly supplying around 40% of Amazon's sales, the e-commerce giant's India sales are surely taking a massive hit right now.

Man with head down on the table as he sits in front of a hand-dawn chart that shows a red arrow plunging down.

Image source: Getty Images.

The implications

India's fast-growing smartphone and internet penetration have been driving rapid e-commerce growth in the country, and the market is expected to reach $200 billion in sales by 2026. Amazon didn't want to miss this gravy train so it committed billions of dollars to make a mark in India's e-commerce space.

More importantly, the company's investments were paying off nicely, and by the end of 2017 it had nearly tripled its share of India's e-commerce market in just three years. But the latest regulations are expected to put the brakes on India's e-commerce growth story. Consulting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers estimates that the regulatory changes could lead to a $46 billion drop in online sales in India by 2022.

That could knock the wind out of Amazon's India sales and hurt the company in the long run as it now gets 30% of its revenue from international operations. Amazon doesn't explicitly mention how much revenue it gets from India, but it can be safe to assume that this market would have been a solid long-term growth driver.

Amazon's international revenue increased 15% year over year during the final quarter of 2018, down from the 29% growth it had clocked in the year-ago period.

What next?

But all is not lost for Amazon as it's looking to find a way out of this mess by restructuring its India operations. The company is reportedly exploring a conversion of Cloudtail and Appario into wholesale entities that will be engaged in business-to-business transactions, selling their goods to other third-party sellers that will then make the final sale to consumers.

People with knowledge of the matter, as reported by the Economic Times, have said that category managers at Amazon are already in the process of looking for preferred sellers who will buy goods from Appario and Cloudtail. Alternatively, reports suggest that Amazon could offload its stake in both these entities so that it can continue selling through them.

In all, Amazon seems to be confident that the change won't affect its India operations as Cloudtail and Appario haven't canceled any purchase orders just yet. However, it remains to be seen how Amazon copes with the latest regulatory challenge thrown its way by the Indian government.

3 Stocks With Breakout Potential

U.S. markets temporarily stumbled on a few headlines late last week, including the weakest retail reports since 2009. This was a shock to traders but the data is for December. These data are when we were at the worst sentiment period during the Christmas correction and government shutdown. So logic suggests that it would be temporary.

Then the markets took another leg lower on mixed news from the China/U.S. tariff talks. The knee-jerk reaction again was to sell stocks. But not all of them were falling. There were a handful of stocks that actually rallied during this red period of the day.

So when stocks rally in the face of major headwinds, it is a good indication that the rally would last especially when the headwinds disappear. In this case, my thesis is that these scary headlines will abate and that stocks, in general, will have a good quarter. So in this case, the safest upside bets would be those stocks that were green during last Thursday’s market dip.

Furthermore, most of them were sporting breakout potential from bullish chart patterns. This adds fuel to the fire and provides clear levels to trade. On that front, I don’t like buying based on pure hopeful speculation. I prefer to use options to sell risk below support and collect the premium. This way, I don’t even need a rally to win. All I need is to pick strong support levels and let time do the work for me.

The price action was bullish in three stocks I track, including Spotify (NASDAQ:SPOT), Micron (NASDAQ:MU) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD). Let’s take a closer look at a few ways to trade them:


Compare Brokers
Spotify (SPOT)

Last week, Spotify showed great strength. I had been tracking its potential breakout from a bullish pattern. On Thursday, even though the markets were falling, Spotify stock was rallying. So that showed relative strength and I went long SPOT stock.

I sold a short-term credit put spreads for this week at $142/$141 for the opportunity to yield 13% in two days. I have a tight stop on that since there is little time to fix mistakes. But there are safer ways to trade this depending on portfolio balance and risk appetite. Traders are not all the same that way.

An alternative way to bet on the upside is to sell the March 22 $129/$128 credit put spread for similar metrics and yield. This can be modified wider or in distance to current price to suit risk tolerances.

Those who are willing and able to buy the shares can sell the Jul SPOT naked $105 put to collect over $3 in premium. If SPOT stock stays above my strike then I collect my maximum gains. But if it falls below it then I have to buy the shares at $105 per share. In that case, I would breakeven at $102.

I can buy temporary insurance by using what I call sacrifice puts. To guard against a crash, I buy April 105 puts for 60 cents. This way I am completely protected but only through mid-April. The same puts for March only cost 15 cents.


Compare Brokers
Micron (MU)

Last year when markets were reeling from negative sentiment, Micron was the whipping stock for traders. They shot it down all the way to sport a trailing 12 months price-earnings ratio of 2X! So, it basically fell to the floor. What a difference a few weeks make.

Year-to-date, MU stock is up roughly 30%. So clearly the bears had a change of heart. They forgot about the inventory and pricing fears that plagued the stock last year. I was lucky to sell puts into the stock at its worst but here I see more upside potential.

The fact that it spiked on Thursday morning when the markets were busy falling tells me that there is real money buying it with conviction. So I could buy the stock or debit calls or spreads to chase the move. Technically, traders could target the zone around $48 per share. But I prefer to sell risk below support and collect the premium rewards.

This is especially helpful since it just spiked almost 5% once already this week. Chasing here could mean I am late to the easy part of the rally. The options activity shows about 70% calls to 30% puts so all signs point up for MU stock.

I sold this week’s 41.5/41 credit put spread on a whim and when the VIX was spiking on the morning headline fears. But the easier trade would be to go out further in time and lower in price for a bigger buffer. March 8th $38.50/$38 credit put spread would also yield 30% on risk if MU closes above $38.50 by March 8. I can modify the placement and width to suit personal preferences.


Compare Brokers
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)

AMD stock was the sherry stock of 2018. While the markets were setting a record in bad performance, AMD delivered a monster year. 2019 also started strong as it is now up 24% on the year.

So clearly the risk appetite for AMD stock is high. The CEO gets a lot of the credit as she has earned the respect of Wall Street. The consensus here is that AMD is the threat for Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) dominance for years to come.

I can profit from this exuberance without any out of pocket expense. For that, I sell AMD March 22nd $19.50/$18.50 credit put spread and collect the potential of 16% yield on risk. All I need is for AMD stock to stay above $19.50 for a few weeks. A shorter term version of this would be March 1 AMD $21/$20 credit put spread for the same metrics. They both have an 80% theoretical odds of success.

This, of course, will require the help of the general markets. And there is risk below since it’s rallied so far there are gaps that may need to fill. Nevertheless, I am confident that I can manage the risk even if I have to own the shares for a while.

Regardless of valuation, and it is expensive, investors want to own it here. This could change like what happened to Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) but there are no signs of it yet.

Nicolas Chahine is the managing director of SellSpreads.com. As of this writing, he did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities. You can follow him as @racernic on Twitter and 

Monday, February 18, 2019

Accumulate Hexaware Technologies; target of Rs 384: Prabhudas Lilladher


Prabhudas Lilladher's research report on Hexaware Technologies


Hexaware delivered weak performance during Q4CY18 with miss on margins and PAT. Revenues came inline with our estimates. Management has given revenue (organic) growth guidance of 12-14% YoY for CY2019 which is inline with our estimates. However, guidance on margins is muted as it expects its CC EBITDA growth to be in-line with CY19 CC revenue growth. We note that this will led to flat margins YoY for CY2019. We now model USD revenue growth assumptions to 13.1/13.8% for CY2019/CY2020E (vs 13.1%/13.4% modelled earlier). We note that select Midcap peers are likely to outpace Hexaware revenue momentum in FY19. Peers like Mindtree /LT Infotech/ NIIT Tech are poised to deliver 15/16/15% USD revenue growth in FY20E respectively in our view. Our USD/INR assumptions are at Rs72/72.5 for CY2019/CY2020E. Led by tepid performance on margins in Q4CY2018 and softer guidance we now model EBITDA Margins at 16.5%/17.0% for CY2019/CY2020E (vs 17.3/17.8% modelled earlier). We downgraded our EPS estimates by 4.8%/1.5% to Rs22/26 per share for CY2019/CY2020E.


Outlook


Hexaware is currently trading at 14x CY19E EPS and 13x June 20E EPS. We maintain our rating Accumulate. We trim our TP by 10.7% to Rs384 (16x June20E EPS).


For all recommendations report, click here


Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on moneycontrol.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.

Read More First Published on Feb 18, 2019 02:10 pm

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Analyzing ASE Technology (ASX) and Magnachip Semiconductor (MX)

ASE Technology (NYSE:ASX) and Magnachip Semiconductor (NYSE:MX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

Get ASE Technology alerts:

This table compares ASE Technology and Magnachip Semiconductor’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASE Technology 6.83% 11.81% 5.10%
Magnachip Semiconductor 5.65% -108.44% 5.65%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ASE Technology and Magnachip Semiconductor’s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
ASE Technology $12.34 billion 0.67 $838.69 million $0.39 9.77
Magnachip Semiconductor $679.67 million 0.35 $84.93 million $0.76 8.97

ASE Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Magnachip Semiconductor. Magnachip Semiconductor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASE Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

ASE Technology has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magnachip Semiconductor has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.5% of ASE Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of Magnachip Semiconductor shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of ASE Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Magnachip Semiconductor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for ASE Technology and Magnachip Semiconductor, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASE Technology 2 1 0 0 1.33
Magnachip Semiconductor 0 1 2 0 2.67

Magnachip Semiconductor has a consensus target price of $10.80, suggesting a potential upside of 58.36%. Given Magnachip Semiconductor’s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Magnachip Semiconductor is more favorable than ASE Technology.

Summary

ASE Technology beats Magnachip Semiconductor on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

About ASE Technology

ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. provides a range of semiconductors packaging and testing, and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) in the United States, Taiwan, Asia, Europe, and internationally. The company offers packaging services, including flip-chip ball grid array (BGA), flip-chip chip scale package (fcCSP), advanced chip scale packages (aCSP), quad flat packages, thin quad flat packages, bump chip carrier and quad flat no-lead (QFN) packages, advanced QFN packages, plastic BGAs, high-band package on package, and 3D chip packages; stacked die solutions in various package types; and copper wire and silver bonding solutions, as well as module-based solutions. It also provides advanced packages, including aCSP; fcCSP; flip-chip package in package, package on package, and BGA packages; hybrid, advanced single sided substrate, integrated passive device, high-bandwidth, and fan-out wafer-level packages; IC wire bonding packages; system-in-package products (SiP) and modules; and interconnect materials, as well as assembles automotive electronic products. In addition, the company offers a range of semiconductor testing services, including front-end engineering testing, wafer probing, logic/mixed-signal/RF module and SiP/MEMS/discrete final testing, and test-related services, as well as drop shipment services; and packaging, testing and shipment, and flip-chip and wafer bumping services. Further, it provides electronic manufacturing services in relation to computers, peripherals, communications, industrial, automotive, and storage and server applications; designs, assembles, manufactures, and sells electronic components and telecommunications equipment motherboards; develops, sells, and leases real estate properties; and produces substrates. The company serves customers in communication, computing, and consumer electronic/industrial/automotive sectors. ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. was founded in 1984 and is based in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

About Magnachip Semiconductor

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and sells analog and mixed-signal semiconductor platform solutions for communications, Internet of Things, consumer, industrial, and automotive applications. The company operates through two segments, Foundry Services Group and Standard Products Group. The Foundry Services Group segment provides analog and mixed-signal foundry services for fabless and integrated device manufacturer semiconductor companies to manufacture a range of products, including display drivers, light emitting diode (LED) drivers, audio encoding and decoding devices, microcontrollers, touch screen controllers, RF switches, park distance control sensors for automotive, electronic tag memories, and power management semiconductors. The Standard Products Group segment offers display solutions, including source and gate drivers, and timing controllers that cover a range of flat panel displays used in ultra-high definition, high definition, full high definition, LED, 3D and organic light emitting diodes televisions and displays, notebooks, and mobile communications and entertainment devices. This segment also offers power management semiconductor products, such as metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors, insulated gate bipolar mode transistors, converters, LED drivers, SSD PMIC products, and switching and linear regulators for televisions, smartphones, mobile phones, desktop PCs, notebooks, tablet PCs, other consumer electronics, and consumer appliances, as well as for industrial applications. It serves consumer, computing, and industrial electronics original equipment manufacturers; original design manufacturers; and electronics manufacturing services companies, as well as subsystem designers. The company sells its products through direct sales force, as well as through a network of agents and distributors worldwide. MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation is based in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Saturday, February 16, 2019

What's Holding Newell Brands Back

When Newell Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: NWL) released its fourth-quarter financial results before the markets opened on Friday, the firm said that it had $0.71 in earnings per share (EPS) and $2.3 billion in revenue. This compares to consensus estimates from Thomson Reuters that called for $0.67 in EPS and $2.43 billion in revenue, as well as the $0.68 per share and $3.74 billion posted in last year's fourth quarter.

The drop in revenues that was seen this past quarter reflected headwinds from the adoption of the new 2018 revenue recognition standard, unfavorable foreign exchange and a decline in core sales.

Reported gross margin was 34.7%, compared with 32.7% in the prior-year period, resulting from pricing, productivity, lower integration and restructuring costs and the impact of the new revenue recognition standard.

In terms of its segments the company reported:

Learning & Development generated net sales of $707 million, compared with $730 million in the prior-year period. Food & Appliances generated net sales of $824 million, compared with $888 million. Home & Outdoor Living generated net sales of $809 million, compared with $872 million.

Looking ahead to the first quarter, the company is calling for EPS in the range of $0.04 to $0.08 and net sales between $1.66 billion and $1.70 billion. The consensus estimates are $0.22 in EPS and $1.8 billion in revenue.

Michael Polk, president and CEO of Newell Brands, commented:

Newell Brands' fourth quarter results reflect solid progress as we continue to execute the Accelerated Transformation Plan (ATP) announced one year ago. We were encouraged by the sequential improvement in core sales growth across all segments, the return to growth of our Learning & Development segment driven by building momentum on Writing, and solid margin expansion as a result of continued diligent cost management and pricing. We returned $1.1 billion to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases and paid down $2.6 billion in debt during the quarter, exiting the year at our targeted leverage ratio. We've planned 2019 to be another year of significant portfolio and organization transformation. We intend to drive the ATP to completion in 2019, and despite the ongoing negative impact of retailer bankruptcies, foreign exchange, inflation and tariffs, we expect to stabilize and then reignite core sales growth, increase margins, and strengthen the operational and financial performance of the company.

Shares of Newell were last seen down about 18% at $17.81 on Friday, in a 52-week range of $15.12 to $29.55. The consensus price target is $23.36.

ALSO READ: Warren Buffett’s Top Stocks for 2019

Friday, February 15, 2019

Hot Safest Stocks To Invest In 2019

tags:AMAT,AGX,TROV,  Today, I will show you how to take our very best investment ideas and make them 10 times better...   That's right. Using this simple strategy, I believe every individual investor managing less than $10 million can earn 50% a year in safe stocks. Returns at this level can transform your retirement... or even build generational wealth.   But this doesn't mean you have to buy risky stocks. And I'm not talking about anything expensive, difficult, or complex. I'm just talking about taking our best, safest ideas... and making one tiny adjustment.   It's something anyone can do. And it's easy.    Can you really make 50% a year?   Yes. In fact, it's almost certain that you will. I'm not talking about generating a little extra income. I'm talking about a way to turn our best ideas into absolute home runs. I'm talking about the best way to make a fortune in the stock market.

Hot Safest Stocks To Invest In 2019: Applied Materials, Inc.(AMAT)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Chris Lange]

    Short interest in Applied Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT) fell to 16.35 million shares. The previous reading was 18.30 million. Shares were trading at $45.20, in a 52-week range of $41.94 to $62.40.

  • [By Chris Lange]

    The stock posting the largest daily percentage loss in the S&P 500 ahead of the close was Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT) which fell about 7.5% to $43.85. The stock's 52-week range is $42.62 to $62.40. Volume was about 52 million compared to the daily average volume of 12.7 million.

  • [By Anders Bylund]

    Shares of Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) fell 11.5% in August of 2018, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. More than half of the pain arrived on the heels of the third-quarter report near the middle of the month.

  • [By Chris Lange]

    Applied Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT) is poised to post its most recent quarterly results Thursday. The consensus forecast is $1.14 in EPS and $4.45 billion in revenue. Shares closed at $54.84 apiece. The consensus price target is $70.14, and the 52-week range is $40.79 to $62.40.

  • [By Timothy Green]

    Kulicke and Soffa Industries (NASDAQ:KLIC) is not a well-known company. The semiconductor packaging equipment specialist is valued at just $1.65 billion, and it recorded just $809 million of revenue last year. That's a much smaller number than those posted by semiconductor equipment giants like Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT), KLA-Tencor (NASDAQ:KLAC), and Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX).

  • [By Ashraf Eassa]

    Although TSMC is an obvious beneficiary from the production of the A12 chip, there's another company that's poised to profit handsomely as Apple and other companies start building chips using TSMC's (as well as other companies') 7nm technologies: Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT).

Hot Safest Stocks To Invest In 2019: Argan, Inc.(AGX)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Federated Investors Inc. PA raised its position in Argan, Inc. (NYSE:AGX) by 26.6% during the first quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The fund owned 99,678 shares of the construction company’s stock after buying an additional 20,936 shares during the period. Federated Investors Inc. PA’s holdings in Argan were worth $4,282,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Media stories about Argan (NYSE:AGX) have been trending somewhat positive recently, according to Accern Sentiment. The research firm ranks the sentiment of news coverage by analyzing more than twenty million news and blog sources. Accern ranks coverage of publicly-traded companies on a scale of negative one to positive one, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. Argan earned a daily sentiment score of 0.24 on Accern’s scale. Accern also assigned news stories about the construction company an impact score of 45.7492523122329 out of 100, meaning that recent news coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an impact on the company’s share price in the immediate future.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System decreased its holdings in Argan, Inc. (NYSE:AGX) by 26.3% during the 1st quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The fund owned 5,343 shares of the construction company’s stock after selling 1,907 shares during the quarter. State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System’s holdings in Argan were worth $229,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

Hot Safest Stocks To Invest In 2019: TrovaGene, Inc.(TROV)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Paul Ausick]

    TrovaGene Inc. (NASDAQ: TROV) fell more than 55% Friday to post a new 52-week low of $0.79 after closing at $1.77 on Thursday. The 52-week high is $19.56. Volume of around 11 million was nearly five times the daily average of about 230,000. The company announced a public offering of $18 million in stock and warrants priced at $1.00 for the unit.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    TrovaGene Inc (NASDAQ:TROV) has been assigned a consensus rating of “Hold” from the six research firms that are currently covering the stock, Marketbeat reports. Four investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold recommendation and two have issued a buy recommendation on the company. The average twelve-month price objective among analysts that have issued a report on the stock in the last year is $7.00.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    TrovaGene Inc (NASDAQ:TROV) shares saw strong trading volume on Thursday . 1,477,200 shares were traded during trading, an increase of 185% from the previous session’s volume of 517,912 shares.The stock last traded at $0.83 and had previously closed at $0.81.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Media stories about TrovaGene (NASDAQ:TROV) have trended somewhat positive this week, Accern reports. Accern identifies positive and negative news coverage by monitoring more than twenty million news and blog sources. Accern ranks coverage of companies on a scale of negative one to positive one, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. TrovaGene earned a media sentiment score of 0.14 on Accern’s scale. Accern also gave news coverage about the medical research company an impact score of 45.974011377318 out of 100, meaning that recent news coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the stock’s share price in the next few days.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Here are some of the news stories that may have impacted Accern’s rankings:

    Get TrovaGene alerts: Average True Range under Consideration: TrovaGene, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROV), USD Partners LP (NYSE:USDP), Tiptree … (stocksnewspoint.com) Take These As A Wake-Up Call: TrovaGene, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROV), PPDAI Group Inc. (NYSE:PPDF), Inseego Corp … (journalfinance.net) Review of Financial analysis: TrovaGene, Inc., (NASDAQ: TROV), Redwood Trust, Inc., (NYSE: RWT) (globalexportlines.com) In which scenario TrovaGene, Inc. (TROV) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) are Trading Now? (nmsunews.com) Analysts’ Views: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc (SMFG) and Trovagene Inc (TROV) (postregistrar.com)

    TROV has been the topic of several recent research reports. Maxim Group reiterated a “hold” rating on shares of TrovaGene in a report on Monday, March 5th. HC Wainwright reiterated a “buy” rating and set a $12.00 target price on shares of TrovaGene in a report on Tuesday, March 6th. ValuEngine cut shares of TrovaGene from a “sell” rating to a “strong sell” rating in a report on Monday, April 2nd. Finally, Zacks Investment Research cut shares of TrovaGene from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, May 3rd. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and four have given a buy rating to the company’s stock. TrovaGene currently has an average rating of “Buy” and a consensus target price of $19.17.

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Colfax Corp (CFX) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Colfax Corp  (NYSE:CFX)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 13, 2019, 8:30 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Colfax Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following management's prepared remarks, we will have a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, today's conference is being recorded for replay purposes.

It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Kevin Johnson, Vice President of Finance. Please proceed.

Kevin Johnson -- Vice President of Finance

Thank you, Haley. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. My name is Kevin Johnson, and I'm Vice President of Finance at Colfax. Joining me on the call today are Matt Trerotola, President and CEO; and Chris Hix, Senior Vice President and CFO.

Our earnings release was issued this morning and is available in the Investors section of our website, colfaxcorp.com. We will be using a slide presentation to walk you through today's call, which can also be found on our website. Both the audio and slide presentation of this call will be archived on the website later today and will be available until the next quarterly earnings call.

During this call, we'll be making some forward-looking statements about our beliefs and estimates regarding future events and results. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those set forth in our SEC filings. Actual results might differ materially from any forward-looking statements that we make today. The forward-looking statements speak only as of today, and we do not assume any obligation or intend to update them, except as required by law.

With respect to any non-GAAP financial measures made during the call today, the accompanying reconciliation information relating to those measures can be found in our earnings press release and today's slide presentation.

Now I'd like to turn it over to Matt, who will start on Slide 3.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Kevin, and good morning. 2018 has been a transformational year for Colfax, during which we reshaped our Company and established an even stronger foundation for our future. First, we finished the year with strong financial results, including earnings growth of 33%, placing us well ahead of the commitment we made in December of 2017.

ESAB achieved strong and accelerating sales growth across all regions, including strong contributions from new products and the team has done a great job of protecting margins in a year of notable cost escalation.

Our Howden business recovered from the market challenges of late 2017 and the team has gotten the business firmly back on a path to mid-teen segment margins. They've successfully grown sales in the faster growing industrial applications, which are now half of the business, and Howden exits 2018 with strong momentum on both order growth and margins and is well placed for a strong performance in 2019. We've successfully driven restructuring actions within both of our businesses and delivered $37 million of restructuring cost savings.

Our progress improving the vitality of both businesses shows the power of CBS and supports our margin and growth improvement. We completed the monetization of our Fluid Handling business at an attractive multiple of over 13 times EBITDA and completed four new bolt-on acquisitions that strengthen and diversify our ESAB and Howden businesses.

We also announced that Colfax has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DJO, a leading global orthopedic solutions company. This acquisition is consistent with our strategy to create a higher margin, faster growing and less cyclical Company. To support our deleveraging plans and future growth investments, we're exploring strategic options for our Air and Gas Handling business, including a potential sale. We believe this will be a very attractive asset to potential acquirers, given all the progress made to strengthen and diversify the business.

Moving to Slide 4, you can see the highlights from our fourth quarter results. Our operating performance was in line with expectations and tax benefits contributed to outperformance. Fabrication technology achieved strong sales growth from continued healthy market demand, as well as new product launches and pricing actions completed throughout the year. Air and Gas Handling drove another quarter of double-digit order growth with industrial remaining very strong, aftermarket accelerating and most end use markets moving in a positive direction. We increased this business' margins through restructuring actions and a deeper application of our business system to improve operational execution.

This month, we successfully completed the DJO acquisition financing that started in the fourth quarter. DJO is a global leader in the attractive growing orthopedic solutions market and we're excited about the potential to apply our business system to further improve the business' growth and profitability.

On Slide 5, you can see ESAB continued growth and -- continued growth trajectory. This was the eighth quarter in a row of core growth at ESAB and we continue to show double-digit growth both overall and core. While healthy margins around the world have been a positive factor in our growth, we also launched 11 new products in 2018, increased our automation backlog and funnel, and added some great acquisitions, Sandvik and GCE that are performing well. I was in Europe recently with the GCE team for our standard 100-day review process. We already have a fast start there, thoughtfully integrating our businesses in the welding market and identifying some exciting gas control growth plans in med tech and life sciences.

During the quarter, we had some translational currency headwinds from the strengthening USD, predominantly in our Argentinian, Brazilian and Russian businesses.

On Slide 6, you can see ESAB's year-to-date and current quarter year-over-year adjusted operating profit performance. The performance was in line with what I communicated on our outlook call in December, margins of 11.6% excluding the October 2018 GCE acquisition, finished the year in line with 2017. Now, as I've talked about on several calls now, we had multiple sources of cost escalation during 2018. Year-to-date pricing actions have delivered nearly 5 points of price to offset material and other inflation pressures. And as these price actions are only covering inflation, the business' margin rates are being compressed by about 50 basis points, both year-to-date and in the fourth quarter. Absent this pressure, we would've had another year of solid margin expansion in this business.

When we exclude the GCE acquisition from Q4, underlying adjusted operating margins were 11.2%. This is a solid step forward from Q3 and our team continued to execute price and productivity actions in Q4 to enter 2019 firmly on the right side of the 2018 price-cost improvement curve.

ESAB's margins are expected to take a step forward in 2019 as additional price and productivity actions flow through and the business has a clear path back to greater than 12% operating margins in the first half of 2019. The healthy margin expansion in our 2019 guidance is consistent with the -- our path to mid-teens for this business.

Slide 7 shows our continued progress reshaping Air and Gas Handling business for less cyclical, more profitable growth. In the fourth quarter, the business had 13% core order growth, plus another couple of points from the recent ACI and ACH acquisitions.

We continue to achieve strong growth in our strategic industrial applications as core industrial orders grew 18% in the quarter. Oil and gas orders grew sequentially, and the profitability of new orders continues to improve. Mining orders grew organically 141% as we secured a large order in the quarter at good margin levels.

Finally, our power markets remained stable and orders, as expected, stepped up sequentially in the fourth quarter.

On Slide 8, the Air and Gas Handling segment core sales grew 11% in the quarter, supported by strong growth in industrial applications. And as expected, Howden performed strongly on margins in the fourth quarter, which improved 230 basis points sequentially and 440 basis points year-over-year to 12.1%. This improvement came from price, productivity, restructuring and strategic choices that we've made in oil and gas to focus on higher margin projects. Backlog ended the year a bit stronger than expected and both backlog size and margin levels support the guidance provided on our December outlook call.

On Slide 9, I want to share with you how the Colfax Business System helped us to drive margin improvement in Howden. Lead process improvement is often thought of as synonymous with manufacturing, but CBS is a holistic business system that helps us to continuously improve across all business activities.

Policy deployment is the core tool in the CBS tool kit and arguably our most powerful tool. Its purpose is to drive breakthrough change within our businesses to advance our strategies. A great example of the impact of policy deployment can be found in the improvement in Howden project management during 2018. In 2017, the Howden leadership team had identified the opportunity to drive improvements in project execution on large newbuild projects which involve complex engineering solutions and teams around the world.

Using policy deployment, the Howden team reengineered their end-to-end project management processes and built a stronger foundation for project execution. This resulted in 2018 improvements in milestone delivery, higher margins and better working capital. These changes are now sustained standard work in the business. This is a great example of how our teams use CBS to deliver improved service to customers and improve financial results.

On Slide 10, we provide an update on our strategic initiatives. The Company recently completed the financing to support the acquisition of DJO and refinance existing bank loans. Chris and his teams did a great job of getting this completed quickly and at attractive terms. The DJO acquisition is progressing as expected. We completed regulatory filings and continue to target a Q1 close. Our experienced integration team is fully engaged and we're all working closely with the DJO team to ensure a smooth transition. I was with the senior DJO team in Dallas recently for their initial CBS training and both sides are excited about the opportunities ahead. The review of our Air and Gas Handling strategic options is well under way, Goldman Sachs and Barclays are leading the efforts and we're moving with speed.

Before I hand over to Chris, I want to comment on our strategic progress. We've strengthened our ESAB and Howden businesses, getting them on to solid path to growth and mid-teens segment margins. The recent DJO new platform acquisition is entirely consistent with our strategic commitment to diversify and strengthen our portfolio. We also see exciting opportunities to further expand in med tech. In summary we made a lot of strategic and operational progress in 2018 and I expect a very successful year for Colfax in 2019.

Now I'd like to hand it over to Chris who will discuss the financial results.

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Matt. On slide 11, you can see Company sales grew 13% in the third quarter to $985 million, reflecting a 11% organic growth and 7% from acquisitions, mostly GCE, that was acquired in October of 2018, but also Sandvik that was acquired earlier in the year. We also faced a 5% currency translation headwind in the quarter from a stronger US dollar, mostly compared with the Argentine peso, Brazilian real and the Russian ruble.

We grew gross profit by $36 million in the quarter and gross margin by 20 basis points, due to continued growth at our FabTech business and very strong Air and Gas Handling operating performance. As Matt mentioned earlier, some of our margin progress has been obscured by the effect of using price to effectively offset inflation, which grossed up ESAB's revenue and cost of goods sold and compressed its reported operating margins by 50 basis points and 20 basis points for Colfax overall.

Despite year-over-year FX translation pressure of nearly $5 million, operating profit increased $23 million or $27 million, excluding $4 million of one-time transaction costs and inventory step-up charges from the recent GCE acquisition. Adjusted margins increased 150 basis points to 9.4% or 180 basis points to 9.7% before one-time transaction costs and inventory step-up charges.

During the quarter, we sold an old ESAB facility as part of an ongoing Colfaxwide program that has included six facilities over the past four years for total cumulative proceeds of about $43 million. Applying CBS drives productivity improvements that frees up capacity and enables footprint rationalization and higher efficiencies. The net benefit of $11 million we recognized in the quarter from the facility sale was offset by non-routine charges, resulting from Argentina hyperinflation, receivable reserves for distributor and the impact of strengthening inventory, standard work, and processes.

Below the line, continued focus from our tax team contributed to this quarter's results as we drove the rate down to 17%. Overall, Q4 operating performance was in line with our expectations and a lower than projected tax rate contributed to the 53% increase in EPS in the quarter.

Slide 12 shows our progress on cash flow performance. Fourth quarter operating cash flow was $126 million versus $104 million last year, with the improvement coming mostly from higher profitability. This higher cash flow was delivered despite the significant growth at ESAB that required working capital investment. The $7 million year-over-year increase in full-year operating cash flow to $226 million does not tell the whole story. The prior year results included $69 million of cash flow generated in the fluid handling business that we divested in December 2017. So the real improvement was $76 million on a consistent basis and we expect to make another healthy step forward in 2019.

I'll finish my remarks on Slide 13 by reaffirming the outlook we provided in December. We started the new year with January results that were consistent with our expectations. For the full year, we continue to expect our Fabrication Technology business to grow high single digits, including a full-year contribution from the GCE business.

We are forecasting stable material costs and the price increases over the past several quarters are expected to lap. Core growth is forecasted to be mid-single digits, about half price and half volume, with operating margins exceeding 12% on the strength of restructuring and pricing actions, including the rollover benefit from initiatives completed in 2018 and further productivity savings.

Our Air and Gas Handling business is expected to grow orders this year mid- to high-single digits, led by continued growth in industrial applications and strengthening mining markets. We continue to expect core growth to be flat, plus or minus, with continued margin growth from restructuring, improved customer project execution and aftermarket initiatives.

After the DJO acquisition is completed, we will provide an update for our expectations for this year. We continue to expect a strong year of profit growth in our existing businesses with adjusted operating profit growth of 20% or more.

That concludes our prepared remarks. Please open up the call for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Mike Halloran of Baird. Your line is now open.

Mike Halloran -- Robert W. Baird & Co -- Analyst

Hey, good morning, everyone.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

How are you doing (ph), Mike.

Mike Halloran -- Robert W. Baird & Co -- Analyst

Could you just talk a little bit about the underlying trends you're seeing on the Fab Tech side? It certainly sounds like some consistency still, despite all the headline noise globally, but maybe a few more thoughts on the trajectory through the quarter into the first quarter so far. Any regional variances, anything by product category that's interesting or showing particular strength or particular weakness as you look to the quarter.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, sure, Mike. So, obviously, the back half last year was good and strong, but that's kind of half and half growth between price and volume growth and some of the strongest parts down the stretch last year, where North America, as well as growth in automation in the business. As we roll over into this year, you can see in our guidance that we are still forecasting to have healthy growth in the business, but lower than that double-digit second half, more of a mid-single digits year, this year. And we're still seeing growth, broad-based growth, but we do see -- expect to see the North America growth come down a little from from that higher spot that it went to last year. And different places in the world, a little to and fro here in the different emerging markets in the world.

Mike Halloran -- Robert W. Baird & Co -- Analyst

Out of curiosity, are you seeing actual weakness on that growth, are you just more or less referring to normal sequential patterns from what we're seeing here cumulatively and comparisons getting a little harder driving the deceleration?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, we're seeing -- we're seeing what we expect to see here in the fourth quarter in terms of some tougher comps and kind of a normal sequential patterns consistent with the guidance that we've given.

Mike Halloran -- Robert W. Baird & Co -- Analyst

Okay. Sounds good there. And then just a question on the price cost-side as you work through the year, FabTech same (ph). Maybe just talk about the price cost curve in the fourth quarter and how you expect the cadence through the year with the moving parts, with your pricing gains as well as the commodity swings we've seen.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, sure. Well, as I said in my remarks, we passed through almost $100 million of price last year, that 5%, a little over $100 million that 5% number and that was throughout the year. We cleared the air kind of on the right side of the equation there versus steel, but definitely down the stretch in the air (ph). There were broader set of inflationary pressures that had us having to continue to drive price there in the third quarter, and the fourth quarter even beyond just the steel impact. And so, as we roll over into the first half of this year, we expect to be able to see nice sequential margin improvement in the business as those price actions continue to flow through and the productivity actions continue to flows through. We see the steel environment has stabilized and so that provides an opportunity to limit the price actions to the other inflationary pressures in the business and to use some of the muscle that was created last year to get some net price in some of the key parts of the product line where there is a value-based opportunity to drive net price improvement in the business.

Mike Halloran -- Robert W. Baird & Co -- Analyst

Appreciate the color, Matt. Thanks.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeff Hammond of KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Jeff Hammond -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Hi, good morning, gentlemen.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Jeff.

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Hi, Jeff.

Jeff Hammond -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

So, just to follow on, on that. The price-cost, like the 50 basis point headwind, is that -- how do you see that kind of shaping up in 1Q, and kind of the cadence through the year? Just -- is all the GCE acquisition noise kind of behind you?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So the kind of mathematical price pressure of passing through price was -- kind of increased throughout last year, but was consistent through most of last year. And so, I think we'll start to lap that we'll have a little bit of it in the first quarter as we move through the price. Absent more steel, we will start to lap that mathematical impact of the price cost. I think in terms of the earnings impact of the price cost, we're entering Q1 on the right side of that and expect to not have a price cost earnings drag and as we move through the year to have a little bit of benefit there.

And then, GCE, certainly the biggest effect from the GCE acquisition was in the fourth quarter, based on when it came in and some of the early things that we do in acquisitions and we will have still a little bit of a drag from some of those early charges and things in the first and second quarter here, but it will be much smaller than the fourth quarter.

Jeff Hammond -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay, great. And then, Matt, you said you're moving with speed in Air and Gas process. Can you just talk about interest levels at this point and what you think best guess on timing is?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, we are really not going to comment on the specifics of the process. We've done all the right things to move into that process with speed and excellence and we've got the business on a good healthy improving path. And so we feel confident in our ability to drive to good outcome there, but we're going to share information at the point that we think is appropriate to share it.

Jeff Hammond -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. And then just one housekeeping. How should we think about tax rate for '19 with and without DJO?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

I'll speak to the tax rate without DJO, and then of course we will provide a bigger update once we've closed the DJO acquisition and we'll come back to the folks with a different sort of outlook. Without DJO, we're continuing to believe that the go-forward sustainable tax rate for 2019 will be in the low -- sort of low 20s. If you look back over time, you can see that we've driven the rate from that kind of low 30s, high 20s, down into the low 20s and we've also taken advantage of other initiatives to drive the rate tactically down below 20%. But on a sustainable basis, right now we believe low 20s is the way to think about it.

Jeff Hammond -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. Perfect. Thanks, Chris.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Andy Kaplowitz of Citi. Your line is now open.

Brad -- Citi Research -- Analyst

Good morning, guys it's Brad speaking (ph) on for Andy.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hi, good morning.

Brad -- Citi Research -- Analyst

So in FabTech, you noted the new product has a contributed growth there and you've obviously been very focused on reinvigorating the product portfolio there over the past couple of years. Can you give us some color maybe on how much the new products contributed to growth in 2019 (ph) and how you're thinking about new products as a contributor to growth in '19 and beyond?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, we definitely have made a lot of progress on that business on vitality, and the amount of revenue coming from new products and that's helping our growth, it's helping our brand, and it is -- at this point broad based across the portfolio. A few years back, it was more concentrated on our equipment product line and we've now got it more broad based across the portfolio. Our view is that the path to strong growth performance over time in that industry is that fresh products, new products, can get you a couple of points of growth that you wouldn't have, if you didn't have fresh and newer products. And so, that's kind of how we view the path to consistently drive an industry-plus growth is to have those good, fresh and new products. Obviously, the revenue contribution from them is larger than that, but in terms of how much it differentiates your growth in any given point in time, we think it's in that kind of a range.

Brad -- Citi Research -- Analyst

Okay. That's great. And then maybe just shifting to Air and Gas Handling, you had nice year-over-year growth in general industrial orders in the business, really every quarter this year and we know that's been a big focus area for you. Can you talk about your visibility to sustaining continued momentum in general industrial growth within Air and Gas Handling?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, we have sustained the momentum there for quite some time now, and we still have healthy funnels and ongoing initiatives across a broad set of industrial segments. So we think the market environment supports ongoing industrial growth, we see the momentum of our initiatives supporting continued growth there. There's no question that like the rest of the business, there is parts of it that are more project-based. And in a given point in time, you might have a little more or a little less, based on kind of which projects are coming when, but between the broad based nature of the growth there and the external environment, as well as our initiative-based momentum, we see the potential to continue that industrial growth in the business.

Brad -- Citi Research -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks, guys. I will get back in queue.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Joe Giordano of Cowen. Your line is now open.

Joseph Giordano -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

Hi, guys, good morning.

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Good morning, Joe.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning.

Joseph Giordano -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

So, on your oil and gas orders, I know the last couple of quarters, Matt, you mentioned that there's been a lot of business out there, and you've kind of made a conscious decision to not pursue it because of the margins inherent there. So you're seeing a little bit of sequential expansion in the order book there. Has the market strengthened there, has there been any change or is it kind of an opportunistic project win, how would you categorize that kind of progress?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

We see the oil and gas market has been gradually moving in a positive direction overall. But if I start from our aftermarket presence in that market, which is more with refineries than anything else that's been on a good improving path there and both the ongoing aftermarket and even some of the retrofit kind of projects there have been coming through. And then second, the part that we're strategically focused on now and going forward in terms of some of the kind of small to medium sized project based -- new project based opportunity there -- there are healthy funnels, there's been some decent project flow, it's still -- as it's been in the past few years, it still continues to be real kind of start-stop versus kind of a strong increasing trend. But it's moving in the right direction and the funnels continue to build there in that business.

Joseph Giordano -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

Okay. And then maybe last for me. I feel like there's a lot of investor talk about DJO and just familiarity with you guys in that type of business. Can you maybe discuss at a high level -- I know you're not going into detail yet, but how does that business -- like what's the management structure, how does that roll up to you, can you talk about your -- how your past experiences with similar businesses give you comfort that -- in how you guys can run that business effectively?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, sure. I would say strategically, we see that as a great add to our Company that really moves us forward in a terrific way and that we'll be able to apply our compounding strategy into. As it comes in, Brady Shirley will lead the business, he's got over 20 years in that orthopedic solutions industry, he has been in the business for about four years, led the implant business for a few years and did a great job getting that on a strong growth path and then he has led the overall business. And he'll come in, and the team will come in, it will be a separate platform reporting into me and having the appropriate connections to our different functional pieces and being supported as they bring CBS into the business. We've already done -- as I said in my comments, we've already done the first round of CBS training with the leadership team and with some of the key folks in the operational team there. And so, we feel very good about that. We get a ton of experience with that team, which is very, very important, but we've also got a fair amount of med tech experience in my leadership team and in our boardroom that helps us to have a perspective to bring to the table there as well.

Joseph Giordano -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

Thanks, guys.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Nathan Jones of Stifel. Your line is now open.

Nathan Jones -- Stifel Nicolaus -- Analyst

Good morning, everyone.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Nathan.

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Good morning, Nathan.

Nathan Jones -- Stifel Nicolaus -- Analyst

Just back to the Air & Gas orders for a minute, looks like you had a really good quarter in the mining business there. Can you talk about the sustainability of those kind of orders where there's some large project orders in that segment during the fourth quarter that maybe won't repeat?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So, first of all, the broad view of mining is quite positive. The -- all indications are that the industry is headed into a good, healthy, multi-year period of investment that has started and is very much expected to continue and all the external indicators suggest that, as well as our customer funnels and our customer dialog. There's no question that, that business, as it's a smaller part of our overall revenue and that the projects can come in lumps, it is a business that quarter-to-quarter can have a degree of lumpiness to it and that enormous growth rate in the fourth quarter is due to a larger project that came in. Now that large project to the mining business was a significant outlier. At the Howden level, it's not -- maybe half of the growth that we had or something like that. So even without that large project, we were in a pretty healthy growth range there in Howden.

And the last thing I should say about mining is that the large project in mining tend to be direct with the mine or if they are through other parties, there is a very strong direct link with the mine. And based on that, we've been able to -- on the recent project, as well as others over time, been able to value sell and get margins for those large projects to make them attractive recently and on a go-forward basis.

Nathan Jones -- Stifel Nicolaus -- Analyst

Okay. So it sounds like there was some large project in there, but the anticipation is that there may be more coming in the future, and we also locked them from a margin perspective?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, that's correct. We expect multiple years of growth, in any given quarter or year, there could be some one-off impacts.

Nathan Jones -- Stifel Nicolaus -- Analyst

Okay, fair enough. On FabTech, you guys have had this mid-teens margin target out there, I think 12 months ago, it was three to four years and we're 12 months further along now. So we have had some fairly significant changes, 50 basis points of margin drag from price cost with the big steel inflation. Is that target still in that timeframe, two to three years from now, you should be at that 15% target? Are there things that have happened that changed the outlook on that business, at least from a timing perspective, or any color you can give us on when you would anticipate being able to get to that mid-teens target now?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, sure. So, we still remain very committed to that target and don't see it as some theoretical future target versus one that we'll be closing in on here in the next couple of years. If you look at our last handful of years, we've shown 50 plus basis points of improvement a year, and last year the underlying improvement was there, it just got consumed by this pass-through. If you look at our guidance, we've guided to more than 50 basis points of improvement for 2019, which would get us well into the 12s. And so, whether the path from '19 forward is -- a couple of years to get to 2015 (ph) or something slightly different than that. I think that's something we'll continue to communicate very transparently, especially as we get into our Investor Day later this year. But we see good opportunity to keep expanding margins there between some net price, continue to drive productivity, some ongoing strategic structural moves in the supply chain in the business. The positive impact of the innovation that we've done in the business there. And then getting some leverage from growth as we get and stay in more of a volume growth environment here for a bit, getting some leverage out of that growth. We still see a clear path to that 15% operating margins.

Nathan Jones -- Stifel Nicolaus -- Analyst

Thanks. One -- just one quick one for Chris on the cash flow. You talked about $69 million from Fluid Handling last year that wasn't in the cash flow numbers this year. Do you have a number handy on what the acquisitions that you've made this year contributed to that cash flow?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Nathan, I don't have those numbers at hand. You can see that the acquisitions weren't significant in the overall scheme of Colfax. But each of those should have brought contributing cash flow to the Company. But I don't have that number at hand.

Nathan Jones -- Stifel Nicolaus -- Analyst

Okay. Fair enough. I'll pass it on. Thanks very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Julian Mitchell of Barclays. Your line is now open.

Julian Mitchell -- Barclays -- Analyst

Hi, good morning. Maybe just another question on the free cash flow. Conversion to adjusted net income was, I think, in the 50s percentage-wise in 2018. So very low level. You talked on the last call about maybe some restructuring charges falling in '19 that helps the conversion step up. Now that the full 2018 numbers are out there, maybe help us a little bit more with the bridge on how the free cash flow steps up and what kind of conversion rate we should expect this year. And also then when you are thinking about pro forma Colfax, ex Air and Gas, including DJO, what level of free cash conversion should investors expect at that point?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

So let me give you a couple of points of reference there, and then, again, I think what I'll suggest is that we'll come back to you after we close the DJO acquisition and we'll talk more about that particular business and any expectations it has on our 2019 performance, which should be very additive from a cash flow perspective. What we've commented on is going from 2018 to 2019, we do expect to have significantly lower restructuring spending. So year-over-year that's a $20 million to $30 million benefit. And then we've also talked about lower pension funding as well by $20 million to $30 million. So those are two pieces in and of themselves that should be additive to free cash flows as you pivot it from 2018 to 2019.

Although I'm not prepared to go into detail on the DJO until we actually close in on the business and therefore can speak to the timing -- specific timing within the year of its contributions, it does have a very attractive free cash flow generation and it comes with the NOLs that -- we should not really be a US taxpayer in 2019 and for several years beyond. So those are a couple of pieces there that should help us to continue to drive free cash flow conversion higher and get us to significant growth in operating cash flows.

Julian Mitchell -- Barclays -- Analyst

Got it. So the free cash flow this year, in '19, ex-DJO, we should expect that to be closer to what -- 80% plus, is that a right sort of level?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I think that for us it's probably healthy to think about that number, and -- as before DJO and all the financing impacts and everything, on a legacy basis, I think we're just over $150 million and our expectation is we can take that up closer to $200 million, plus or minus.

Julian Mitchell -- Barclays -- Analyst

Thank you very much. And then my follow-up. Second question would really be around -- you've mentioned productivity as a profit driver several times in both businesses. Maybe just help us understand what was the total productivity savings tailwind to your EBIT in 2018? And what do you think that will be in 2019? And any color on the FabTech, specifically in that regard?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Okay. So productivity for us is a combination of the ongoing day to day actions that we drive with continuous improvement in CBS. And then I would contrast that with restructuring actions that we've taken, which are more episodic and more structural in nature. We've identified for next year is, 2019, -- I should say this year, is the $20 million of benefits from restructuring in the Fabrication Technology business and $25 million in the Air and Gas Handling business. So we do have the structural improvements that will continue into 2019 for these businesses. But then in all of our businesses, we drive the day to day productivity with an objective that we at least cover inflation or drive beyond inflation and that comes from just hundreds or thousands of actions going on across the business and as we continuously improve the operations.

Julian Mitchell -- Barclays -- Analyst

Thanks. And what was the realized restructuring benefit in 2018?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

About 40 -- $37 million, I think.

Julian Mitchell -- Barclays -- Analyst

Great. Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Walter Liptak of Seaport Global. Your line is now open.

Walter Liptak -- Seaport Global -- Analyst

Hi, thanks, good morning.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Walt, good morning.

Walter Liptak -- Seaport Global -- Analyst

Just wanted to ask you a couple of follow-ons on the FabTech business and just to clarifying things. The restructuring benefits, are those done in 2019, or is that what I heard you say or is there some more restructuring benefits that come through in 2020 that help you get to that 15% margin goal?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Beyond 2019, yes. So we shared that 2019. I think there is a little bit of ongoing restructuring opportunity in that business. Part of it is just the legacy supply chain that we've got and the opportunity to keep making that more strategic. But also as we bring in new acquisitions as we have, sometimes those bring some new opportunities and we drive the synergy opportunities there. And so our view is that that business -- likely we will have -- continue to have a little bit of ongoing restructuring on into '20 and even '21, that is just smaller, but just the appropriate ongoing strategic step to be doing in that business.

Walter Liptak -- Seaport Global -- Analyst

Okay. And then just sticking with FabTech. The EU exposure for you guys -- considering auto in industrial, I wonder if you can talk about maybe a mid-single-digit growth number and first half growth assumptions versus second half or should we just think about mid-single digits for the full year?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, to your question about Europe, I mean, there's no question. The last few years Europe has hung around, been a little in the positive from a volume standpoint, higher on a revenue standpoint at times, but it's not been -- it's been different countries and different quarters and depending on what's going on in the different industries over there and other things. And we expect Europe to stay in that range of being a little bit in the positive from a volume standpoint, a little higher than that from a revenue standpoint, given some of the price. And certainly some markets like auto in Germany feeling a little bit of pressure, but some markets, like some of the oil and gas stuff starting to wake up a little bit more and so there is an offsetting effect there.

As far as the growth through the year, we definitely -- as we said, the second half of last year was quite strong there and part of that was a very strong price impact on top of the volume and there was some real strength in our automation business there down the stretch of last year in terms of specific projects flowing through. And so, as we roll over into '18 that mid-single digits is a good indicator from a core growth standpoint as to how we expect to grow the business. And certainly, the extra growth from automation and some of the price impacts will subside a little bit as we move into the first and second quarter, but we still should be solidly in that mid-single digit range.

Walter Liptak -- Seaport Global -- Analyst

Okay. Great. And then, just a last one. On corporate expense, without DJO, what are you thinking about for that and should we expect extra expenses related to transactions et cetera?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

So we would expect corporate expenses to be roughly in line with 2018 levels as you go into 2019. There'll be some puts and takes, as you suggest, as we're integrating DJO and some of the cost related to the potential divestiture of the Howden business and so forth. But largely, I'd say, largely in line.

Walter Liptak -- Seaport Global -- Analyst

Okay, great. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Seth Weber of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Seth Weber -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Hi, good morning, guys. I actually wanted to also ask about the -- I wanted to ask about the automation business specifically. You kind of just touched on it, but as it sounds like you may be decelerating here, or the comps are maybe just getting harder. I mean, can you just comment -- is that -- do you feel like customers are more reluctant to do bigger ticket projects as this or make bigger ticket investments at this point? Or is it just you feel like you saw some big growth there and comps are just more difficult, and that's why you don't think automation momentum will continue next year? Thanks.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I want to be clear. We still see healthy growth in automation, based on the drive to productivity, the need for productivity solutions in the industry. And we see a healthy funnel there and a healthy backlog, it's really more that -- it is -- there is a little more project-based nature to that business and so in some quarters it's a bigger contributor than others and down the stretch last year, we got some extra boost there and we expect it to continue to -- to contribute to growth nicely here in 2019, as well. We're just don't necessarily seeing that extra boost as we enter the year.

Seth Weber -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. So you don't feel like customer tone toward bigger ticket CapEx has changed, is what I'm trying to figure out?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

No. We have not seen any meaningful change in customer tone to bigger ticket CapEx at this point.

Seth Weber -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks. And then I just wanted to clarify the puts and takes around this facility sale. I think you said $11 million benefit, and was that essentially fully offset by these non-routine items? And can you just give us some granularity on what -- I think, there were three buckets there. Can you give us any numbers around those three buckets?

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Sure. Yes, the $11 million net benefit that we referred to was completely offset by the items that we mentioned, the largest of which was a bit over a half came from the -- some of the work that we've done on inventory. As you can see, we've been continuing to drive working capital turns up and installing CBS at greater levels throughout the organization. And as you dig deeper and deeper, you find things that you want to make hard decisions on and reduce Muda (ph) and drive efficiency. And that certainly drove us to make some decisions in the quarter and move on and clean up some things from a process perspective. I'd say the other pieces are roughly half and half between a distributor, large distributor that we had in emerging market region that we felt it was prudent to take a reserve against some of the receivables as we work through financial issues with that distributor and continue to keep the momentum that we have in the marketplace there. And then lastly, the hyperinflation that we've had with Argentina, that has largely wrapped up now and behind us. So those are the principal pieces.

Seth Weber -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. Very helpful. Thank you very much guys.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Andrew Obin of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is now open.

Andrew Obin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Hey, good morning, guys.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Andrew.

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Hi, Andrew.

Andrew Obin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Just a question on pricing for FabTech. How should we think about it for '19? Would you have to give any of it back with commodity prices heading down?

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Andrew. Certainly what has happened in this market in the past is that when commodity prices go down, some of that is passed through automatically contractually, and the rest tends to pass through over a little bit of time and historically the producers have been able to hold on a little bit of that, just like on the way up, you have to play a little catch-up, on the way down, maybe you get a little bit of the benefit. But it doesn't sustain. And so, we're not planning on any significant margin contribution from steel dropping. We are counting on some net price, just from using that muscle that we've got to continue to drive thoughtful value-based price improvements in the business.

Andrew Obin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

And just a follow-up question. You guys have unique insights into emerging markets, just because you have more exposure than others. Could you give us some more detailed view on sort of China, Russia, Brazil, would greatly be appreciated? Thank you.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, sure. So let me start with China, which is -- we certainly have seen the -- some of the industrial slowing that's been talked about quite a bit. But both of our businesses actually are kind of balanced across stuff that is kind of pure industrial and things that are little more infrastructure related and whether it's direct infrastructure like investments in rail or tunnel by the government or kind of indirect infrastructure spending where the government is driving environmental programs that then require companies to invest. And so what we're seeing is a little bit of a shift to infrastructure as a driver, more than just industrial growth as a driver, but still the growth holding up OK in China. And even industrial growth is going to be at a lower level over there, but all indications are that there will still be a pretty decent amount of industrial growth.

If we move to Russia, that's an area where we've had a lot of success over time. In our businesses, we've got very strong positions, there is no question that, that's a country that last year things got challenging with the sanctions environment over there and that affected the Russian market and continues to have an impact on the Russian market. I think we felt a lot of that last year and so that's going to continue this year and we think at some point turn in the right direction, but that's a market that we see kind of going sideways at this point in time.

And then Brazil, we're feeling quite good about it. We think the election over there and some of the trends that the local belief is that as we work through 2019 here that Brazil is going to move in a good, healthy, positive direction, and we'll see what the timing of that is and we're doing some good proactive things in the country to make sure that we're set up to take advantage of that.

Andrew Obin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thanks so much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Matt Trusz of G.research. Your line is now open.

Matt Trusz -- G.research -- Analyst

Good morning. Thank you for taking my question.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hi, Matt.

Matt Trusz -- G.research -- Analyst

So follow-up question on FabTech. When we think about the equipment versus consumables mix, which has continued to grind higher for about two years now, I'm wondering how do you interpret this, is it reflecting, you think, increased equipment market share, the benefit of accelerated depreciation and changing customer behavior? Or is there something else going on, or just natural mix of (ph) demand? Thanks.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

For us -- if I just think about the equipment versus consumables growth rates, I would say the consumer growth rates have tended to be a little higher, based on the price that's being passed through. The volume growth in consumables is probably the same or lower than the equipment, but the price impact is the most there.

On the equipment side, the automation growth comes on that side and certainly is pulling the growth up there and leading to more growth and more of a piece on equipment. And then certainly some of the acquisitions that we've done -- we've acquired more business on the equipment front than we have on the consumables front and so that's had an impact on our business as well.

Matt Trusz -- G.research -- Analyst

Thank you. And then just on Air & Gas, did the structural changes you're making as you pivot to general industrial open up any path to maybe exceeding mid-high-teens EBIT, or I guess mid-teens EBIT, especially given what's some peers achieve or do you view that more as the tools to achieve that initial mid-teens target? Thank you.

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, surely. Clearly, with both of our businesses, our view has been for a number of years that we have a strategic goal of getting to that mid-teens target, and we've got execution plans for how to get there and we're executing them. And I think that's the case in both businesses that we've got credible execution plans to how to get the rest of the way from where we are now to mid-teens. We have also in both businesses been strategically thinking about and working on, OK, once you get there, how do you go forward? And certainly the structural improvements to the Air and Gas Handling business with the industrial acquisition adds we brought there and as well as some of the stuff we've done organically, create a more credible path to get not only to that 15%, but to be thinking about how to get beyond that, but we're going to focus on getting there first and meanwhile we'll work on the plans for how we get further.

Operator

Thank you. And at this time there are no further questions, I would like to hand the call back over to Kevin Johnson for any closing remarks.

Kevin Johnson -- Vice President of Finance

Thanks. Haley. Thanks everyone for joining us today. Look forward to speaking to you on the next call.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's conference. You may now disconnect and have a great day.

Duration: 57 minutes

Call participants:

Kevin Johnson -- Vice President of Finance

Matthew L. Trerotola -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Christopher Hix -- Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Mike Halloran -- Robert W. Baird & Co -- Analyst

Jeff Hammond -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Brad -- Citi Research -- Analyst

Joseph Giordano -- Cowen and Company -- Analyst

Nathan Jones -- Stifel Nicolaus -- Analyst

Julian Mitchell -- Barclays -- Analyst

Walter Liptak -- Seaport Global -- Analyst

Seth Weber -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Andrew Obin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Matt Trusz -- G.research -- Analyst

More CFX analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.